Last week EP Vantage revealed which big pharma companies are spending the most on M&A this year, with the likes of Abbott Laboratories, Sanofi-Aventis and GlaxoSmithKline clearly placing the most faith in a “bolt-on” acquisition strategy to bolster pipelines and diversify their business (Vantage Point - Is big pharma spending its way out of trouble?, October 2, 2009).
Today we assess the trends and approaches to product licensing within the same big pharma group, revealing some interesting insights. Once again Sanofi and Glaxo appear at the top of the table so far this year with the most deals and highest amounts paid out in upfront fees, whereas Abbott’s track record of licensing pharmaceutical products is virtually negligible. Meanwhile the mega-mergers of Wye-Pfi and SchMerck appear to have had contrasting effects on the licensing behaviour of the acquiring parties – whereas Pfizer has taken its foot off the deals pedal, Merck is pushing it to the metal.
The following analysis draws on product licensing data from EvaluatePharma, highlighting the total number of deals, and where disclosed by the companies the aggregated upfront fees paid as well as total deal values.
|Product Licensing Activity: 2007 to 2009 latest|
|Deal Count||Upfront Fee ($m)||Deal Value ($m)||Deal Count||Upfront Fee ($m)||Deal Value ($m)||Deal Count||Upfront Fee ($m)||Deal Value ($m)|
|Johnson & Johnson||5||507||826||8||78||931||9||194||1,693|
|Merck & Co||11||172||1,397||6||22||577||11||150||1,665|
Big pharma more selective
Whilst the picture for 2009 is obviously yet to be completed, in terms of year-on-year trends it would seem that big pharma is striking fewer deals than in the past and the total and average value of these deals is also in decline.
In 2007 big pharma signed 147 product deals with $2.1bn paid out in upfront fees; in 2008 these figures dropped to 96 and $1.6bn respectively and so far this year 83 deals have been struck for a total upfront commitment of $1.8bn. The figures for 2009 may be skewed slightly by the recording of Johnson & Johnson's recent $500m deal with Elan for the Irish group's Alzheimer's franchise including bapineuzumab; technically the $500m, used to establish a joint venture to develop bapineuzumab, is an upfront fee but not in the conventional sense.
The overall picture of a decline, or at best a flat level of deals, is surprising given that one of the assumed impacts of the credit crisis was that big pharma would be flooded with licensing opportunities and could take up more of these offers in an attempt to bolster their ailing pipelines.
Although big pharma is no doubt awash with partnering offers, it would seem they have become much more circumspect in their licensing behaviour and perhaps have also been able to use their greater bargaining power to drive down the cost of these deals.
Not good news in general therefore for companies seeking a lucrative deal for their pipeline assets. Not only is competition for the attention of big pharma much tougher, it seems the size of any deal is also likely to be lower than in previous years.
Another natural force potentially driving down deal numbers and values is the recent spat of mega-mergers which has already removed Genentech from the partnering field and will soon see the removal of Wyeth and Schering-Plough as potential partners. Interestingly however, neither Wyeth nor Schering have been particularly prolific on the licensing front in recent years so it may not be such a major loss in this respect.
Pfizer, until this year and their move on Wyeth, had been very active in licensing new products, but it seems they are now pre-occupied with the merger and may remain fairly dormant after the deal is completed as they reassess their pipeline opportunities.
Conversely, Merck does not appear to be as constrained by its pending acquisition of Schering and in fact this year looks like being its busiest licensing period in recent times. Companies seeking a partner may therefore have more luck at Merck’s door than Pfizer's.
Big deals still out there
Nevertheless, a review of the top ten biggest deals so far this year reveals that the billion dollar licensing deals can still be struck, even if the upfront fees are not quite as high as in the past.
AstraZeneca, previously conspicuous by being quite so quiet on the both the M&A and licensing front, recently signed the biggest deal to date when signing a broad deal with Nektar Therapeutics for up to $1.5bn. Astra also signed a potentially significant deal with Forest Laboratories for ceftaroline although financial terms were not disclosed.
The league table also highlights that big pharma remains the place to be in terms of securing the biggest deals; outside of these companies only Celgene and Biogen Idec have struck deals that feature in the top ten.
|Top 10 licensing product deals in 2009 (YTD)|
|Rank||Product||Pharmacological Class||Therapeutic Category||Company||Product Source||Status||Deal Value ($m)||Upfront Fee ($m)|
|1||NKTR-118 + NKTR-119||Opioid antagonist||Other gastro-intestinal agents||AstraZeneca||Nektar Therapeutics||Phase II||1,500||125|
|2||XL147||PI3K inhibitor||Cytostatics||Sanofi-Aventis||Exelixis||Phase II||1,217||140|
|3||PEG-IFN-lambda||Interferon||Anti-virals||Bristol-Myers Squibb||ZymoGenetics||Phase I||1,107||105|
|4||Alpharadin||Radiotherapy agent||Radiopharmaceuticals||Bayer AG||Algeta||Phase III||789||60|
|5||Kynapid||Anti-arrhythmic||Cardiac therapy||Merck & Co||Cardiome||Filed||700||60|
|6||PRT128||Platelet ADP antagonist||Platelet aggregation inhibitors||Novartis||Portola Pharmaceuticals||Phase II||575||75|
|7||GI-4000||Ras vaccine||Immunostimulants||Celgene||GlobeImmune||Phase II||540||40|
|8||MM-121||Anti-cancer MAb||Anti-neoplastic MAbs||Sanofi-Aventis||Merrimack Pharmaceuticals||Phase I||530||60|
|9||Fampridine SR||Potassium channel antagonist||MS Therapies||Biogen Idec||Acorda||Phase III||510||110|
|10||Bapineuzumab||Anti-beta amyloid MAb||Nootropics||Johnson & Johnson||Elan||Phase III||500||500|