
Esmo 2022 – Keytruda secures a renal cancer monopoly
Merck & Co should be able to make its recently won claim to have the first anti-PD-(L)1 drug approved for adjuvant treatment of kidney cancer for some time to come. Judging by two late-breaking abstracts just revealed for the upcoming Esmo conference, its two rivals Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche slipped up here by similarly wide margins. The Checkmate-914 study of Opdivo plus Yervoy, and the Immotion-010 trial of Tecentriq, both showed sub-10% numerical improvements in risk of disease progression versus placebo, but with highly non-significant p values the datasets offer no meaningful value. The authors of each concede that primary endpoints were not met, and the Checkmate-914 investigators note higher discontinuations due to adverse events with Opdivo plus Yervoy than with placebo. Merck won US approval in adjuvant renal cancer based on a 32% reduction in disease progression favouring Keytruda in the Keynote-564 trial, and no doubt reasons for the differing readouts will be discussed at Esmo. Interestingly, Checkmate-914 also had an Opdivo monotherapy cohort, though nothing has been disclosed about this. Perhaps more will be forthcoming when Checkmate-914 is discussed at Esmo’s presidential symposium on Sunday.
Cross-trial comparison in adjuvant renal cell carcinoma | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Disease-free survival | ||||
Drug (company) | Trial | Medians | Stats | Status |
Keytruda (Merck & Co) | Keynote-564 | NR vs NR | HR=0.68 (0.53, 0.87), p=0.001 | US approved Nov 2021 |
Opdivo + Yervoy (Bristol Myers Squibb) | Checkmate-914 | NR vs 50.7mth | HR=0.92 (0.71, 1.19), p=0.535 | Study fail |
Tecentriq (Roche) | Immotion-010 | 57.2 vs 49.5mth | HR=0.93 (0.75, 1.15), p=0.495 | Study fail |
NR=not reached. HR=hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals in brackets). Source: product label & Esmo. |