Biogen windfall reveals Europe's best capitalised and most mispriced biotech

News

Step forward Europe’s best capitalised biotech, Forward Pharma. Or at least it will be in a few weeks when Biogen’s $1.25bn cheque clears, a payment that marks the first step in settling a long-running patent dispute between the two companies.

Finer details, including any ongoing royalty payments, have yet to be confirmed pending further hearings, but it seems likely that around a 10% royalty will be due on future Tecfidera sales, a figure that many had been expecting. What is less clear is why Biogen did not simply buy Forward, which was capitalised at $862m before news of the deal emerged.

Maybe Forward was not a seller, or was simply holding out for more than the US biotech was prepared to pay. If anyone knows the future value of Tecfidera it is Biogen – many believe that the drug will face intensifying competition from newer MS agents in the coming years – so perhaps the Danish company saw a rosier future than Tecfidera's owner was prepared to support.

Either way, Forward's valuation likely reflected a mid-point of two scenarios for investors – a takeout at a considerable premium, or a crash to zero had a deal not emerged. The Nasdaq-listed company essentially has nothing else to its name other than its Tecfidera rival, and no doubt a large team of in-house patent lawyers.

Ongoing argument

Not that the situation is over yet. The sellside describes the deal as it stands as an insurance policy; Ronny Gal from Bernstein wrote today that the move was “somewhat courageous by the new CEO – as we will find out within couple of months if the money was well spent or not”.

The spat is essentially over who was first to patent the active ingredient in Biogen’s blockbuster MS pill Tecfidera, dimethyl fumerate, for use in MS. Forward has always insisted that it filed patents in the US and Europe about 1.5 years before Biogen, and this settlement would seem to acknowledge that this was the case.

Biogen attests that it has patent protection until 2028 – this is held by the ‘518 patent in the US, and the ‘537 patent in Europe. Forward’s project, FP 187, has similar patents that it believes have been infringed, and would protect it until 2025. These patents are ‘871 in the US and ‘342 in Europe.

Interference hearings will be held in the next few months to rule on who filed first and therefore whose patents are valid (Event – Biogen gears up for Tecfidera’s day in patent court, November 14, 2016). Biogen has agreed to royalties ranging from 0% to 20%, depending on the outcome.

Win win?

Access to these additional patents could be important given a separate challenge to the ‘514 patent by the hedge fund manager Karl Bass, via inter-partes review. A win for him could have opened the door to generic competitors from 2023, something that Biogen can now shield itself against by pivoting to Forward’s IP. A decision is due by March 22.

Despite the removal of the worst-case scenario of a patent loss with no insurance policy in place, Biogen shares were little moved. The outcome of the hearings in the next few months will be needed to calculate just how savvy the US biotech has been in this situation.

The clear winner at this stage is undoubtably Forward, as the cash payment is assured. Its Nasdaq-listed shares jumped 52% this morning, giving it a new market value of $1.4bn. The fund Nordic Biotech is a major investor in the thinly traded stock, and Florian Schönharting, Nordic's partner and chief investment officer, is listed in Forward's 2015 annual report as beneficial owner of a 55% equity stake.

With the company saying it is now considering share buybacks and a cash distribution, Mr Schönharting is about to enjoy a lucrative start to 2017.  

To contact the writer of this story email Amy Brown in London at AmyB@epvantage.com or follow @AmyEPVantage on Twitter

Share This Article