
New investors push corporate-backed venture funds down the rankings
Two big beasts of the biotech venture world – Orbimed and NEA – have long dominated the private financing space, a look back over 10 years of investor activity finds. A comparison of the first and second halves of the decade also shows how a couple of the big corporate venture funds have slipped down the rankings, though in Novartis’s case this was largely caused by an explosion of activity from new, cash-rich private funds. The Swiss pharma’s venture arm was involved in roughly the same proportion of rounds in the two five-year periods analysed, yet fell several places. Glaxo’s retreat – its venture arm, SR One, sits at 47th place in the later five-year period – culminated in a spin-off last year. Notable arrivals in the top 10 more recently include Cormorant, which largely backs large, pre-flotation crossover rounds, financings that have become common with IPO window wide open. GV is Google’s venture arm, a new cash-rich investor that backed broadly across the life science space, funding developers of therapeutics and diagnostics alike.
Biopharma's biggest venture investors – a 10-year view | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investor ranking 2011-15 | Investor ranking 2016-20 | |||||||
Ranking | Investor | Round count | % of rounds as lead investor | Ranking | Investor | Round count | % of rounds as lead investor | |
1 | Orbimed Advisors | 104 | 36% | 1 | Orbimed Advisors | 148 | 31% | |
2 | New Enterprise Associates | 96 | 42% | 2 | New Enterprise Associates | 95 | 32% | |
3 | Novartis | 79 | 25% | 3 | RA Capital | 93 | 32% | |
4 | Glaxosmithkline | 59 | 27% | 4 | Arch Venture Partners | 90 | 31% | |
5 | Versant Ventures | 57 | 30% | 5 | Alexandria Venture Investments | 89 | 4% | |
6 | Third Rock Ventures | 55 | 27% | 6 | Cormorant Asset Management | 85 | 12% | |
7 | Kleiner Perkins | 54 | 17% | 7 | GV | 76 | 13% | |
8 | Polaris Partners | 53 | 9% | 8 | Novartis | 72 | 22% | |
9 | F-Prime Capital | 53 | 21% | 9 | Johnson & Johnson | 69 | 17% | |
10 | SV Life Sciences | 52 | 19% | 10 | Deerfield | 66 | 36% | |
Source: Evaluate Pharma. |
Additional analyses of corporate venture can be found here: The retreat of corporate venture funding?