Fewer than 200 medtech VC rounds closed in 2018

Investors swerve traditional medical devices in favour of artificial intelligence-enabled diagnostics.

If big medtechs are becoming more demanding when evaluating potential takeout targets, the same is true of investors. For the first time, the number of venture funding rounds closed in a year has dropped beneath 200.

The 196 VC deals done in 2018 is, it goes without saying, the lowest number for more than a decade. The amount raised in total, though, is holding fairly steady: at $5.7bn it is higher than ever before with the exception of 2017’s total. Given Verily’s $1bn investment round last week – the first one-shot billion-dollar deal closed by a private medtech – it appears that the coming year might also leave 2018 in the dust.

This analysis covers only companies developing products for clinical application – either diagnosing or treating human disease. 

Quarterly medtech VC investments

This is not to say that 2018 was a washout. But it is obvious that traditional medical devices are not appealing to investors in the same way as previously. Of the top 10 rounds raised in 2018 all but two went to groups developing diagnostics – either DNA sequencing-based in vitro tests or novel imaging technologies. 

Grail leads the charge, with a second tranche of its series B worth $315m and a $300m series C taking the first and second places. Helix is a consumer genetics company, selling products including a $160 test resulting from a collaboration with the Mayo Clinic, designed to allow healthy individuals insight into health and disease risks and mutations associated with hereditary genetic conditions. 

Oxford Nanopore’s $140m round in March underscored its unicorn status, and was followed by a $66m equity investment by Amgen in October. But the group is expected to take orders worth just $75m in 2018, and its plans to disrupt the sequencing market will take some doing (Oxford Nanopore, the disruptive unicorn gunning for Illumina, April 9, 2018).

Sequencing technologies are popular with venture investors because they are relatively cheap to develop and are often lightly regulated; meanwhile advances in machine learning mean that data can be sifted rapidly to provide meaningful, usable results. Roche’s $2.4bn takeover of one such group, Foundation Medicine, will not have been lost on VCs either. 

Top 10 VC rounds of 2018
Date Round Company Investment ($m) Focus
January 11 Series B (second close)* Grail 314.7 Sequencing-based in vitro diagnostics
May 21 Series C Grail 300.0 Sequencing-based in vitro diagnostics
September 27 Series D Butterfly Network 250.0 Portable ultrasound
February 14 Series E Heartflow 240.0 Cardiac imaging and blood flow analysis
November 28 Series E Auris Health 220.0 Endoscopy
March 1 Series B Helix 200.0 Sequencing-based in vitro diagnostics
January 31 Series E Insightec 150.0 Ultrasound therapy and magnetic resonance imaging
June 14 Undisclosed Mevion Medical Systems 150.0 Proton therapy
March 26 Undisclosed Oxford Nanopore Technologies 140.0 Sequencing-based in vitro diagnostics
August 28 Series D Outset Medical 132.0 Portable dialysis
*Grail's series B raised $1.2bn in total. Source: EvaluateMedTech.

And these groups are immensely popular as takeover targets. Philips alone has bought 10 companies specialising in imaging, informatics and other software since mid-2016, and GE Healthcare bought Nvidia for similar technology (The new league of imaging companies remaking the market, August 29, 2018). Imaging technologies have also been popular investment targets. This sector has moved rapidly in recent years from a fairly staid area where the most that could be hoped for was incremental improvements to established imaging machines to more mobile, advanced and combined technologies, again boosted by artificial intelligence. 

The paucity of VC deals this year has pushed the average size of a medtech funding round to nearly $30m. Verily’s monster round means the chances of this average figure decreasing in 2019 are approximately nil. The chances of traditional device makers displacing data-driven diagnostics companies in terms of appeal to VCs are probably about the same. 

Average size of medtech VC rounds

Share This Article