Alnylam risks being an IgAN also-ran

Today’s mid-stage data on Alnylam’s immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) candidate cemdisiran make for uneasy reading when put into context. The group said that in a phase 2 study in 31 patients with IgAN, cemdisiran reduced 24-hour proteinuria by 37% relative to placebo. True, this does appear to be better than the 29% placebo-adjusted figure posted by Calliditas’s Tarpayo in its pivotal trial back in 2020, though the usual caution should be exercised when comparing data from different trials. But Tarpayo is a pill, whereas cemdisiran, a small interfering RNA, is injected subcutaneously once a month. Moreover, other projects, also oral, from Travere and Chinook might well outdo cemdisiran. Unfortunately it is hard to tell. Alnylam gave only the placebo-adjusted figure for proteinuria, whereas Travere used irbesartan, not placebo, as control, and Chinook's study was uncontrolled. Alnylam cautioned that its trial was descriptive only, and did not include statistical hypothesis testing – both Calliditas and Tarpayo were able to show statistical significance versus control in their much larger trials. Despite this Alnylam, along with partner Regeneron, is planning to take cemdisiran into phase 3.

Cross-trial comparison of selected IgAN projects
Drug Company Trial N Route Time point Reduction in proteinuria
Tarpayo/
Kinpeygo
Calliditas Ph3 Nefigard (NCT03643965) 365 Once-daily pill 9mth 34% (29% pbo-adjusted*)
Sparsentan Travere  Ph3 Protect (NCT03762850) 380 Once-daily pill 36wk 50% (38% adjusted for irbesartan control*)
Atrasentan Chinook Interim data from Ph2 Affinity (NCT04573920) 20 Once-daily pill 24wk 59% (no control arm)
Cemdisiran  Alnylam Ph2 (NCT03841448) 31 Once monthly sc injection 32wk 37% pbo-adjusted
*Statistically significant. Source: clinicaltrials.gov, company releases. 

Share This Article